Toward a Filipino framework for AI
Toward a Filipino framework for AI

Toward a Filipino Framework for AI A Wiseacre's Guide
As we navigate the complexities of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is esse[4D[K
essential to develop frameworks that are tailored to our unique cultural, s[1D[K
social, and economic contexts. In this blog post, we will explore the role [K
of toward a Filipino framework for AI, highlighting the strengths and weakn[5D[K
weaknesses of existing proposals and what it means for the future of AI dev[3D[K
development in the Philippines.
A New Approach
The conversation around AI in Manila has shifted from borrowed ideas to gro[3D[K
grounded solutions that address the country's specific needs. Dominic Ligot[5D[K
Ligot, Director for AI Ethics and Data Governance of the Philippine AI Busi[4D[K
Business Association, has been at the forefront of this effort. He has iden[4D[K
identified two strong foundation bills House Bills (HBs) 13 and 658.
Strengthening Foundations
Side by side, HBs 13 and 658 share similar principles, structures, and pena[4D[K
penalties. Both establish a whole-of-government apparatus, including the Ph[2D[K
Philippine Council on Artificial Intelligence (PCAI), a governance framewor[8D[K
framework, code of ethics for developers, and regulatory sandbox. While the[3D[K
they share some similarities, there are notable gaps that need to be addres[6D[K
addressed.
Gaps in Current Proposals
Neither HB 13 nor HB 658 includes a risk-tiered classification system for A[1D[K
AI applications, nor do they have standalone provisions on Filipino-languag[16D[K
Filipino-language AI or cultural representation. Worker protections, while [K
present, are not framed as enforceable rights. Both bills create a separate[8D[K
separate Artificial Intelligence Board, which sits atop existing regulators[10D[K
regulators.
A Sharper Alternative
Benchmarking notes and comparative analysis from Ligot and the CirroLytix a[1D[K
and Data and AI Ethics PH team point to a sharper alternative the Philippi[8D[K
Philippine AI Flourishing Act (4E Paifa). Proposed by Ligot, Claire Tayco, [K
and Carljoe Javier, this bill has been submitted to the technical working g[1D[K
group.
Governance
The biggest difference between 4E Paifa and existing proposals is in govern[6D[K
governance. Instead of creating new regulators, 4E Paifa establishes a Nati[4D[K
National AI Council under DOST that focuses on coordination and strategy. T[1D[K
This approach reduces confusion and keeps rules more consistent across sect[4D[K
sectors.
AI Ethics Officer
4E Paifa introduces the role of the AI Ethics Officer (AEO), required for a[1D[K
any organization deploying AI systems. This role is not unlike the Data Pri[3D[K
Privacy Officer, which became a standard in Philippine boardrooms after the[3D[K
the Data Privacy Act of 2012.
Rights Framework
The proposal codifies enforceable protections around human oversight, anti-[5D[K
anti-discrimination, redress, and transparency, framed explicitly as the R[2D[K
Rights of Filipinos in the Age of AI. It mandates advance notice before a[1D[K
automation displaces workers, free reskilling programs, and compensation fo[2D[K
for displacement. There is also a provision requiring Filipino-language AI [K
systems and datasets.
Conclusion
As we move forward in developing AI frameworks that are relevant to our con[3D[K
context, it is crucial to prioritize governance, ethics, and rights. The Ph[2D[K
Philippine AI Flourishing Act offers a sharp alternative to existing propos[6D[K
proposals, one that balances efficiency with people's rights. As Ligot puts[4D[K
puts it This is better than if we attempted a more comprehensive bill. Th[2D[K
The tradeoff is that the full bill will take much longer and may never pass[4D[K
pass. We are already fully exposed.
Key Takeaways
The conversation around AI in Manila has shifted from borrowed ideas to g[1D[K
grounded solutions.
HBs 13 and 658 share similar principles, structures, and penalties but ha[2D[K
have notable gaps.
4E Paifa offers a sharper alternative with stronger governance, ethics, a[1D[K
and rights frameworks.
Prioritizing human oversight, anti-discrimination, redress, and transpare[9D[K
transparency is crucial for AI development.
Keywords Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philippine AI Business Associat[8D[K
Association, AI Ethics Officer, National AI Council, Rights of Filipinos in[2D[K
in the Age of AI.