Encourage walking, bicycles and light electric vehicles
Encourage walking, bicycles and light electric vehicles

Title Pedaling Towards a Greener Future The Case for Encouraging Wal[3D[K
Walking, Bicycles, and Light Electric Vehicles
The world's heavy dependence on fossil fuels has severe consequences. As fu[2D[K
fuel costs rise and supplies dwindle, it's essential to reduce our vulnerab[8D[K
vulnerability. Unfortunately, instead of embracing alternative modes of tra[3D[K
transportation, we've stuck to our car-dependent culture.
Where did we go wrong? In Metro Manila, cities like Manila, Pasig, and San [K
Juan removed bike lanes installed during the pandemic. The Metropolitan Man[3D[K
Manila Development Authority (MMDA) banned light electric vehicles (LEVs) f[1D[K
from major roads and opposed the expansion of bicycle lanes. These misguide[8D[K
misguided restrictions made LEVs unattractive and uncompetitive.
We've also neglected to maintain and upgrade sidewalks and bike lanes. In t[1D[K
the 2026 national budget, active transport infrastructure received a paltry[6D[K
paltry P69 million. This sends a clear message Filipinos should opt for ca[2D[K
cars or motorcycles instead, and we're now paying the price.
The road safety argument against LEVs is spurious. According to MMDA statis[6D[K
statistics, bike/e-bike/pedicab were involved in only 1.52% of road crash[5D[K
crashes, while cars were responsible for 52%. Since LEVs are lighter, they [K
rarely cause major injuries; motor vehicles typically kill and maim on our [K
roads.
The solution isn't to ban vulnerable road users but to make roads safe for [K
them. In many major roads, there's no proper sidewalk or bike lane. Only si[2D[K
six percent of Filipino households own cars, yet nearly all road space is p[1D[K
prioritized for cars. This endangers pedestrians, especially the millions o[1D[K
of children who walk to and from school daily.
A meaningful response is to create networks of safe corridors for walking a[1D[K
and cycling, making these permanent and high-quality. Active transport infr[4D[K
infrastructure should be at the core of contingency planning in case fuel s[1D[K
supplies dry up. The benefits are considerable cities will become more liv[3D[K
livable; there will be less noise and air pollution; Filipinos will have he[2D[K
healthier, active lifestyles; there will be less crowding and queues for li[2D[K
limited public transport; and people will have more money for basic necessi[7D[K
necessities.
How do we take this forward? We need to create protected pathways on all ro[2D[K
roads, separating pedestrians and cyclists from motor vehicles. These shoul[5D[K
should be created even if it means reducing road space for four-wheeled mot[3D[K
motor vehicles. If more car or motorcycle users shift to walking or cycling[7D[K
cycling, there would also be less road congestion for those whose only trav[4D[K
travel option is a private motor vehicle.
On every major road with three or more lanes in each direction, the safe pa[2D[K
pathway for walking and cycling can be the mixed traffic lane (minimum 3.5-[4D[K
3.5-meter width) closest to the curb. Physical separation is needed; paint [K
alone is insufficient protection. During the pandemic, we created pop-up [K
protected pathways marked by bollards or traffic cones.
Motor vehicles should be kept out of these pathways with strict enforcement[11D[K
enforcement. On roads too narrow for a separate, protected pathway, the ent[3D[K
entire road can be made into a safe shared space. By lowering speed limit[5D[K
limits to 30 kph or less, introducing traffic-calming infrastructure (humps[6D[K
(humps, speed tables, etc.), and ensuring pedestrian/cyclist priority at al[2D[K
all times, vulnerable road users can move safely.
These active transport pathways should not disappear once oil prices recede[6D[K
recede. They should be made permanent and continuously improved. Shade tree[4D[K
trees should be planted along them to lower temperatures; landscaping budge[5D[K
budgets should be incorporated in the cost of road transformation. These wi[2D[K
will make localities more attractive and welcoming for walking and cycling.[8D[K
cycling.
Finally, MMDA and LTO regulations that restrict the operation of LEVs shoul[5D[K
should be rescinded. These make no sense in our current crisis and are in v[1D[K
violation of the Electric Vehicle Industry Development Act (Evida), which a[1D[K
aims to provide an enabling environment for the development of electric veh[3D[K
vehicles, including options for micromobility.
The current crisis should catalyze reduced dependence on fossil fuels and i[1D[K
increased adoption of fuel- and pollution-free modes of travel. We can come[4D[K
come out of this crisis with healthier, more productive, and more resilient[9D[K
resilient communities.
Keywords walking, cycling, light electric vehicles, active transport, [K
infrastructure, road safety, sustainability, environmentalism