Don't invoke sovereignty selectively, China told

Sovereignty's Double Standard A Call to Consistency in International Relations

In the complex landscape of international relations, one fundamental principle remains paramount sovereignty. While it is essential to uphold sovereignty as a universal standard, some countries have been known to invoke it selectively to advance their geopolitical interests. This blog post aims to explore the significance of sovereignty and why it is crucial to uphold it consistently, not just for countries that rely on international law, but for all nations that value their territorial integrity.

The Selective Invocation of Sovereignty A Double Standard?

China's recent criticism of the United States for its military strikes on Iran has sparked a heated debate about sovereignty. Beijing called for respect for Iran's territorial integrity, while also emphasizing the need for dialogue to address the conflict. However, this selective invocation of sovereignty raises questions about China's own commitment to upholding this principle. Does it apply universally, or is it a rhetorical device invoked to suit China's interests?

The Importance of Consistency A Universal Standard

National security expert and civic leader Jose Antonio Goitia argues that sovereignty is not a rhetorical device, but a universal standard. If it is invoked as a principle, it must be honored everywhere. This means that countries that invoke sovereignty to protect their own interests must also recognize the territorial integrity of others. Consistency is key to upholding sovereignty; a nation cannot defend its sovereignty in distant conflicts while undermining the lawful maritime rights of its neighbors.

The Philippines' Case A Prime Example of Sovereignty Under Threat

The Philippines is a prime example of a country that has seen its sovereignty threatened by China's selective invocation. Despite a landmark ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016, China has continued to reject the decision and engage in maritime activities in the West Philippine Sea. This has led to incidents of harassment and obstruction by Chinese vessels against Filipino boats operating within the country's recognized maritime zones. The Philippines' experience serves as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding sovereignty consistently.

A Pattern of Maritime Pressure A Threat to Sovereignty

Goitia notes that China's expansionism is not reactive diplomacy, but deliberate strategic revisionism executed through incremental encroachment, sustained maritime pressure, and calculated ambiguity. This pattern of behavior is not limited to the Philippines but has been observed in other countries as well. The consistent application of the principle of sovereignty is crucial to defending against such threats.

Conclusion Consistency is Key

In conclusion, the future of international relations depends on the consistent application of the principle of sovereignty. It is not a matter of aligning with one global power over another, but a question of respecting established international rules. The Philippines, like other countries, deserves the respect and protection that comes with upholding sovereignty. As we move beyond 2026, it is crucial that we prioritize the consistent defense of sovereignty and reject the selective invocation of this fundamental principle.

Keywords Sovereignty, International Relations, Consistency, Maritime Law, West Philippine Sea, China, Philippines, Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Edward Lance Arellano Lorilla

CEO / Co-Founder

Enjoy the little things in life. For one day, you may look back and realize they were the big things. Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.